Tuesday, 23 November 2010

Trailer Making Companies

Trailer Making Companies.

Pretty much all films have trailers, marketing campaigns and much more to gain awareness of the film, to gain hype for the film and to make people want to see the film. There are companies out there, which focus on this, and only produce trailers and marketing campaigns.

Film producers often go to these companies for help in distributing their films. The trailer companies would make a trailer for the producers, which would then be sent to the distribution companies to gain awareness for the film.

Just a few Companies, which focus on trailers and marketing campaigns, are:

  • Trailer Park
  • The Ant Farm

A detailed look at ‘Trailer Park’

This is a company, which will produce a trailer for a film, nothing but a trailer. They are given an idea of what to aim for, the final product, this will maybe be told by the director of the film and his vision of a trailer and what it should include. Trailer Park is then given the film, or a lot of footage from the film in which they can work with.

They started out in 1994 with the founder, Tim Nett, they were a small movie trailer house working with the likes of Spielberg and Scorsese, which has grown into the biggest entertainment marketing and content agency in the whole world.

Trailer Park has won countless awards over the past few years ranging from the best marketing campaign for Tony Hawks Project 8 and Best comedy for Boart.

"Whether it's a blockbuster movie, AAA video game release, first-run TV show, Blu-ray documentary, EPK, or massive live event, our job is to highlight your property and showcase it to the world." - quote taken from http://tinyurl.com/TPAbout

Trailer Park have been involved with many movies, some being:

  • Yes Man
  • Wall-E
  • The Simpsons Movie
  • War of the Worlds
  • I am Legend
  • Cloverfield
  • Borat

:)

Thursday, 18 November 2010

The BBFC Classification Guidelines.

The BBFC Classification Guidelines.

U

Universal –Suitable for all It is impossible to predict what might upset any particular child. But a ‘U’ film should be suitable for audiences aged four years and over. ‘U’ films should be set within a positive moral framework and should offer reassuring counterbalances to any violence, threat or horror. If a work is particularly suitable for a pre-school child to view alone, this will be indicated in the Consumer Advice.

Discrimination No discriminatory language or behaviour unless clearly disapproved of.

Drugs No references to illegal drugs or drug misuse unless they are infrequent and innocuous, or there is a clear educational purpose or anti-drug message suitable for young children.

Horror Scary sequences should be mild, brief and unlikely to cause undue anxiety to young children. The outcome should be reassuring.

Imitable behavior No potentially dangerous behavior which young children are likely to copy. No emphasis on realistic or easily accessible weapons.

Language Infrequent use only of very mild bad language.

Nudity Occasional natural nudity, with no sexual context.

Sex Mild sexual behavior (for example, kissing) and references only (for example, to ‘making love’).

Theme While problematic themes may be present, their treatment must be sensitive and appropriate for young children.

Violence Mild violence only. Occasional mild threat or menace only.

The information from this section of the post was taken from: http://tinyurl.com/BBFCU On the 18th November 2010


‘PG’ Parental Guidance

General viewing, but some scenes may be unsuitable for young children Unaccompanied children of any age may watch. A ‘PG’ film should not disturb a child aged around eight or older. However, parents are advised to consider whether the content may upset younger or more sensitive children.

Discrimination Discriminatory language or behavior is unlikely to be acceptable unless clearly disapproved of or in an educational or historical context. Discrimination by a character with which children can readily identify is unlikely to be acceptable.

Drugs References to illegal drugs or drug misuse must be innocuous or carry a suitable anti-drug message.

Horror Frightening sequences should not be prolonged or intense. Fantasy settings may be a mitigating factor.

Imitable behavior No detail of potentially dangerous behavior which young children are likely to copy. No glamorization of realistic or easily accessible weapons.

Language Mild bad language only.

Nudity Natural nudity, with no sexual context.

Sex Sexual activity may be implied, but should be discreet and infrequent. Mild sex references and innuendo only.

Theme Where more serious issues are featured (for example, domestic violence) nothing in their treatment should condone unacceptable behavior.

Violence Moderate violence, without detail, may be allowed, if justified by its context (for example, history, comedy or fantasy).

The information from this section of the post was taken from:

http://tinyurl.com/BBFCPG

On the 18th November 2010



’12A’/’12′

Suitable for 12 years and over Exactly the same criteria are used to classify works at ‘12A’ and ‘12’. These categories are awarded where the material is suitable, in general, only for those aged 12 and over. Works classified at these categories may upset children under 12 or contain material which many parents will find unsuitable for them.

The ‘12A’ category exists only for cinema films. No one younger than 12 may see a ‘12A’ film in a cinema unless accompanied by an adult, and films classified ‘12A’ are not recommended for a child below 12. An adult may take a younger child if, in their judgment, the film is suitable for that particular child. In such circumstances, responsibility for allowing a child under 12 to view lies with the accompanying adult. The ‘12’ category exists only for video works. No one younger than 12 may rent or buy a ‘12’ rated video work.

Discrimination Discriminatory language or behavior must not be endorsed by the work as a whole. Aggressive discriminatory language or behavior is unlikely to be acceptable unless clearly condemned.

Drugs Any misuse of drugs must be infrequent and should not be glamorized or give instructional detail.

Horror Moderate physical and psychological threat may be permitted, provided disturbing sequences are not frequent or sustained.

Imitable behavior Dangerous behavior (for example, hanging, suicide and self-harming) should not dwell on detail which could be copied, or appear pain or harm free. Easily accessible weapons should not be glamorized.

Language Moderate language is allowed. The use of strong language (for example, ‘fuck’) must be infrequent.

Nudity Nudity is allowed, but in a sexual context must be brief and discreet.

Sex Sexual activity may be briefly and discreetly portrayed. Sex references should not go beyond what is suitable for young teenagers. Frequent crude references are unlikely to be acceptable.

Theme Mature themes are acceptable, but their treatment must be suitable for young teenagers.

Violence Moderate violence is allowed but should not dwell on detail. There should be no emphasis on injuries or blood, but occasional gory moments may be permitted if justified by the context. Sexual violence may only be implied or briefly and discreetly indicated, and must have a strong contextual justification.

The information from this section of the post was taken from:http://tinyurl.com/BBFC12-12A On the 18th November 2010


’15′

Suitable only for 15 years and over No one younger than 15 may see a ‘15’ film in a cinema. No one younger than 15 may rent or buy a ‘15’ rated video work.

Discrimination The work as a whole must not endorse discriminatory language or behaviour.

Drugs Drug taking may be shown but the film as a whole must not promote or encourage drug misuse. The misuse of easily accessible and highly dangerous substances (for example, aerosols or solvents) is unlikely to be acceptable.

Horror Strong threat and menace are permitted unless sadistic or sexualized.

Imitable behavior Dangerous behavior (for example, hanging, suicide and self-harming) should not dwell on detail, which could be copied. Easily accessible weapons should not be glamorized.

Language There may be frequent use of strong language (for example, ‘fuck’). The strongest terms (for example, ‘cunt’) may be acceptable if justified by the context. Aggressive or repeated use of the strongest language is unlikely to be acceptable.

Nudity Nudity may be allowed in a sexual context but without strong detail. There are no constraints on nudity in a non-sexual or educational context.

Sex Sexual activity may be portrayed without strong detail. There may be strong verbal references to sexual behavior, but the strongest references are unlikely to be acceptable unless justified by context. Works whose primary purpose is sexual arousal or stimulation are unlikely to be acceptable.

Theme No theme is prohibited provided the treatment is appropriate for 15 year olds.

Violence Violence may be strong but should not dwell on the infliction of pain or injury. The strongest gory images are unlikely to be acceptable. Strong sadistic or sexualized violence is also unlikely to be acceptable. There may be detailed verbal references to sexual violence but any portrayal of sexual violence must be discreet and have a strong contextual justification.

The information from this section of the post was taken from:

http://tinyurl.com/BBFC15

On the 18th November 2010



’18′

Suitable only for adults No-one younger than 18 may see an ‘18’ film in a cinema. No-one younger than 18 may rent or buy an ‘18’ rated video.

In line with the consistent findings of the BBFC’s public consultations and The Human Rights Act 1998, at ‘18’ the BBFC’s guideline concerns will not normally override the principle that adults should be free to choose their own entertainment. Exceptions are most likely in the following areas:

  • Where the material is in breach of the criminal law, or has been created through the commission of a criminal offence.

  • Where material or treatment appears to the BBFC to risk harm to individuals or, through their behaviour, to society – for example, any detailed portrayal of violent or dangerous acts, or of illegal drug use, which may cause harm to public health or morals. This may include portrayals of sexual or sexualised violence which might, for example, eroticise or endorse sexual assault.

  • Where there are more explicit images of sexual activity which cannot be justified by context. Such images may be appropriate in ‘R18’ works, and in ‘sex works’ (see below) would normally be confined to that category.

In the case of video works (including video games), which may be more accessible to younger viewers, intervention may be more frequent than for cinema films.

Sex education at ‘18’ Where sex material genuinely seeks to inform and educate in matters such as human sexuality, safer sex and health, explicit images of sexual activity may be permitted.

Sex works at ‘18’ Sex works are works whose primary purpose is sexual arousal or stimulation. Sex works containing only material, which may be simulated, are generally passed ‘18’. Sex works containing clear images of real sex, strong fetish material, sexually explicit animated images, or other very strong sexual images will be confined to the ‘R18’ category. Material which is unacceptable in a sex work at ‘R18’ is also unacceptable in a sex work at ‘18’.


The information from this section of the post was taken from: http://tinyurl.com/BBFC18 On the 18th November 2010



:)

A Movie, Beginning to End

A Movie, Beginning to End

  • A film writer thinks up a idea for a movie or takes an existing idea what has already been thought up.
  • The writer then would write up the idea into a script.
  • The script is then purchased by most commonly a Film Studio to be made.
  • People are hired to take part in the production of the film, a director would be found, the crew who will film it, makeup clothing, setting and a Cast will be found by searching for people who are fit for the role of the character.
  • The film is then made and the finished product will be sent to the Film studio that bought the film early on.
  • The film is then sent to distribution companies to distribute the film to the world and gather hype for it.
  • While advertisements for the film are being made the film is sent to prospective buyers who are the head of Cinema firms.
  • The Cinemas and Distribution companies decide on a price for the film to lease it for viewing in their cinema firms.
  • The film is then sent off to the firms once everything has been negotiated.
  • The cinema shows the movie for a specific number of weeks, this will be in the agreement for lease.
  • People buy tickets to see the movie; the cinemas make their profit.
  • At the end of the movies run at the cinema, the cinema firm sends the movie back to the distribution company.
  • After the movies cinema run, it is then brought onto DVD.

:)

Tuesday, 16 November 2010

Ways of Grouping People

Ways of Grouping People.

NRS Way

The NRS (National Leadership Survey) Survey the Chief Income Earner of a household. Basically the person who makes the person who earns the most money in that household. They see the family as a single consuming unit without generational or life-stage distinctions and conflicts therefore basing the family by the answers of the person who has been questioned.

The ways the people are grouped, are in a social hierarchy table, the table follows.

Grade

Social Status

CIE’s Occupation

A

Upper Middle Class

Higher Managerial, Administrative or Professional

B

Middle Class

Intermediate managerial, administrative or professional

C1

Lower Middle Class

Supervisory or clerical and Juniors managerial, Administrative or professional

C2

Skilled Working Class

Skilled Manual Workers

D

Working Class

Semi and Unskilled Manual Workers

E

Those at the lowest levels of subsistence

State Pensioners or widows (no other earners), casual or lowest grade workers

I think that this way of grouping people is gives incorrect answers as it is only based on the Highest member of the family, not everybody views is the same as the highest member of the families. For example, the father is the highest earning member, think, does the son and mother have the exact same interests as the father? In some cases, possibly but in most cases not really. This is why the way of grouping people is unfair and incorrect, as not everybody will have the same interests as each other.

ABC Way

The ABC (Audit Bureau of Circulation) works in a very similar way to the NRS.

:)